X

Finite element modeling of the consolidation behavior of multi-column

Engineering Library

 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Saadedin
    Thread Author
    Administrator
    • Sep 2018 
    • 36027 
    • 18,828 
    • 2,852 

    Finite element modeling of the consolidation behavior of multi-column





    Technical Communication

    Finite element modeling of the consolidation behavior of multi-column

    supported road embankment



    1. Introduction



    The construction of embankments overlying soft soil with a

    high groundwater level often leads to large lateral pressures and

    movement, excessive settlements as well as slope and bearing failures,

    which usually result in long construction delays and costly

    remedial works. In such instances, ground improvement measures

    are often used to enhance stability and minimize ground movement.

    Examples of such soil improvement methods are preloading,

    vertical drains or grouting injection [1–3].

    In China, combinations of cement–fly ash–gravel (CFG), soil–cement

    (SC), and lime columns are often used as ground improvement

    measures to support highway embankments overlying soft

    soils. This system consists of installing different column types with

    different lengths and diameters to support the embankment fill

    and to mobilize the strength and stiffness of the soil at shallow

    depths. Fig. 1 shows an example of such a composite foundation,

    where the embankment is supported by long CFG columns or SC

    columns and shorter lime columns (also called chemico columns).

    The long columns are generally much stiffer than the short columns

    and they are used much like piles to mobilize the bearing

    capacity of the deeper soil strata. The more flexible lime columns

    strengthen and stiffen the shallower soil strata, thereby allowing

    the latter to be utilized as a load-supporting system. In many areas

    in China, this ground improvement method is being increasingly

    adopted.

    In recent years, a substantial amount of research has been conducted

    on such multi-column composite foundations. For instance,

    Liu et al. [4] and Chen et al. [5] performed field tests on composite

    foundation comprising two types of columns. Zhou et al. [6] carried

    out field tests on a composite foundation with three to four different

    column types. Chen [7] reported finite element analyses on

    multi-column composite foundation. Yan et al. [8] developed a systematic

    design method for multi-column composite foundation

    while Zheng et al. [9] proposed a design methodology for CFG–lime

    column composite foundation, which is now being used extensively

    in China and has proven to be an economical way of controlling

    settlements within the allowable levels and increasing the

    bearing capacity. Liang et al. [10] performed three-dimensional finite

    element method analyses of a composite piled raft foundation

    with different pile types. Zheng et al. [11] reported three-dimensional

    finite element method analyses of a multi-element composite

    foundation with SC–lime columns. Zheng et al. [12] conducted a

    series of three-dimensional finite element analyses on CFG–lime

    columns composite foundation with varying lengths and diameters.

    However, there are very few studies on multi-column composite

    foundations formed by CFG–lime columns or SC–lime

    columns at present.

    To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to

    address the behavior of multi-column composite foundation for





    Download

    *

  • musafer
    Free Membership
    • Apr 2024 
    • 30 
    • 15 

    #2
    الله يجزاك الخير
    Comment
    Working...
    X